MENU

AI agents - the new shape of work

The next phase of AI is already beginning.

For the last two years most people have experienced AI in the same way.

You ask a question. The model answers.

Prompt → response.

This interaction model has been incredibly powerful. But it is also relatively simple. The AI is effectively acting as a very advanced assistant - generating content, analysing information, or helping solve individual problems.

Something more interesting is now beginning to emerge. Instead of answering questions, AI systems are starting to pursue goals. These systems are known as agents.

And they represent a meaningful shift in how work gets done.

An agent with well-defined boundaries and clear objectives can become an extremely powerful organisational capability. The difference lies in the thinking behind the system.

Gavin Fudge, Nolo Apps

What is an AI agent?

An AI agent is a system that can pursue an objective autonomously.

Instead of responding to a single prompt, an agent can plan tasks, gather information, use tools, and adjust its behaviour as it progresses toward a defined goal.

Researchers often describe the basic loop of an agent as something like:

Goal → Plan → Act → Evaluate → Adjust

In other words, the agent behaves less like a calculator and more like a junior operator working toward an outcome.

A simple example might be a system tasked with researching potential suppliers for a product line. Instead of waiting for prompts, the agent might:

  • search the web for suppliers
  • collect product specifications
  • compare pricing
  • analyse delivery lead times
  • compile a report

All without step-by-step instructions from a human.

In practice the agent still depends heavily on AI models such as large language models, but it also uses additional components — memory, planning logic, and external tools.

The result is something closer to a software worker than a traditional application.

Agents are moving from research to reality

For several years the idea of autonomous agents was largely theoretical. Recently that has changed.

Many of the major AI platforms now support agent frameworks directly. OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and others are actively building infrastructure for systems that can plan tasks and use tools.

OpenAI's Assistants and Agents frameworks, for example, allow models to call external tools, write and execute code, retrieve information, and manage multi-step workflows.

Meanwhile, open-source ecosystems such as LangChain and AutoGPT have experimented with autonomous agent systems capable of pursuing longer sequences of tasks.

The technology is still developing, but the direction is clear — AI is evolving from tools to actors.

The difference between tools and agents

This shift might sound subtle, but it has significant implications.

Traditional software tools wait for instructions — agents work toward objectives.

A spreadsheet performs calculations when someone enters data. A CRM records interactions when someone logs a conversation. These tools extend human capability, but they still depend on human initiation.

Agents introduce a new layer — they operate continuously within defined boundaries, carrying out work on behalf of people.

In practice this might mean agents that:

  • monitor inventory levels and automatically reorder stock
  • analyse customer behaviour and generate campaign suggestions
  • review contracts and highlight risk areas
  • coordinate logistics updates across systems

Many organisations already perform these activities through complex workflows and manual coordination. Agents have the potential to compress much of that coordination into autonomous processes.

But they introduce an important question. Who decides how the agent behaves?

Agents still need human judgement

If AI systems are increasingly capable of executing tasks, humans are still responsible for determining what should happen and why. Every agent requires design decisions.

Someone must determine:

  • the goal the agent should pursue
  • the information it is allowed to access
  • the tools it can use
  • the limits of its autonomy
  • when it should escalate to a human

These are not technical configuration questions. They are judgement calls.

An agent that is poorly designed can amplify mistakes very quickly. An agent with well-defined boundaries and clear objectives can become an extremely powerful organisational capability.

The difference lies in the thinking behind the system.

Why agents matter for operational systems

In operational environments — supply chains, product development, logistics, finance — the potential impact of agents is particularly significant.

Much of the work in these environments involves coordinating structured processes across multiple systems.

For example:

  • a purchase order triggers supplier communication
  • supplier confirmation triggers production updates
  • production updates trigger shipping arrangements
  • shipping updates trigger finance and inventory adjustments

Traditionally this coordination requires people to monitor systems and push information from one step to the next.

Agents introduce the possibility of systems that understand the process and carry out those transitions automatically.

Platforms like Airtable are particularly well suited to this model because they already function as structured operational layers. They hold the data, the workflows, and the context that agents need to act intelligently.

The AI does not replace the system. It operates within it.

Designing the agent economy

This leads to a deeper shift in how organisations think about work.

The question is no longer simply how to automate tasks. It becomes how to design systems of agents and humans working together.

Some work will be carried out by autonomous agents. Some work will remain human. Much of it will be collaborative. In this environment the most valuable capability may not be writing prompts or configuring tools — it may be the ability to design the structure of the system itself.

Which brings us to a concept that computer scientists have emphasised for decades.

Computational thinking.

References

Wooldridge, M. and Jennings, N. R. (1995). Intelligent agents: theory and practice. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2), 115-152.

OpenAI. (2025). New tools for building agents. Available at: https://openai.com/index/new-tools-for-building-agents/

OpenAI API. (2025). Agents SDK documentation. Available at: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/agents-sdk/

OpenAI. (2025). A practical guide to building agents. Available at: https://openai.com/business/guides-and-resources/a-practical-guide-to-building-ai-agents/

What this means for your operations

01
AI agents pursue goals autonomously — they plan, act, evaluate, and adjust without step-by-step instructions.
02
Every agent requires human judgement: someone defines its goals, data access, tools, autonomy limits, and when to escalate.
03
Structured operational platforms are already the data layer agents need. The AI doesn't replace the system. It operates within it.